


My AS coursework was not the prettiest thing in the world, at the time I thought it was pretty good, however looking back it makes me cringe with how deluded I was. There are so many little (and big!) things that I would change If i could do it again, and to be honest I would just start over. However, there are also a couple of of positives that I can pick out. In order to start as I mean to go on, lets start with the positives. One thing I do like about the magazine is the 'Brick' theme which is running in the background. This is probably the only big thing I like about the magazine, as I really do think that it creates a continuity in the magazine, however this could be taken quite negativley as it could be perceived as quite lazy, whist other could find it boring. Either way it is something I actually like about my magazine I also like the picture that I took for my contents page because think it is perfect for the tone of the article. The brick theme continues in this picture however my favorite thing is the angle that the picture is taken from. Combined with the expression on his face it really cuts an opposing figure. He doesn't look angry, he just looks above you, like you are not worth his time of day and that he doesn't care what you think. I really love this vibe, as although I feel it is morally wrong and in real life I'd rather freeze my foot and get my best friend to beat me over the head with it that be dealing with this type of person, it is the person many people desire to be, a kingpin, a 'Boss' if you will.
Now to move on to the negatives, the many, many negatives. Instead of calling them negatives, I shall call them 'things to improve upon' and 'Lessons learned' if not for anything else for my own sake. First off, the font. Across the board I now realize that the font I used is defiantly not right for my magazine. The small font looks... weedy?(If that is a useable term) and the large font looks unnecessarily gordy messy and untidy. I spent ages on 'DaFont' attempting loads of different fonts, and alas I feel I made completely the wrong decision and ended up making my magazine look daft. I also need to point out the cover picture which has quite a visible mistake on it. It may not be something that you would notice by just looking at the cover, but it is something that you may notice upon reading further into the magazine. Josh, my friend and model has different coloured skin on the front cover to the colour it is in the contents page and the double page spread, which is very unprofessional. I assume the problem is based at a difference in lighting, which is something I realized at the time but thought I could get around the problem quite easily with photoshop however I lacked the skills and the memory to remember to do it. It really breaks the illusion that the magazine is real, because it is an issue that could have so easily been resolved. Finally (because we don't have all day) the boxes. You may have noticed that there are many boxes/ rectangles dotted all over the place, especially on my contents page. I thought it made the page look quite modern at the time, however that couldn't have been further from the truth, which was that it made the page look like it was created by a three year old on an Fisher Price laptop. I was aiming for the boxes to look like they had been stuck on the brick wall, however in reality look like they are floating in mid air. I feel this was made worse by my continual desire to change my page, I couldn't leave it alone. I would think 'Oh i'll just tweak that' and 'if I put a circle there it'l fill a whole' when `I was actually just making the magazine look worse and worse. The lesson learned here was not to tinker with your product to much, as you will just over saturate it with things you don't need leaving other areas bear.